High-Country Health Food and Cafe in Mariposa California

'Click' Here to Visit: 'Yosemite Bug Health Spa', Now Open.
'Click' Here to Visit: 'Yosemite Bug Health Spa', Now Open. "We provide a beautiful and relaxing atmosphere. Come in and let us help You Relax"
'Click' for More Info: 'Chocolate Soup', Fine Home Accessories and Gifts, Located in Mariposa, California
'Click' for More Info: 'Chocolate Soup', Fine Home Accessories and Gifts, Located in Mariposa, California
'Click' Here to Visit Happy Burger Diner in Mariposa... "We have FREE Wi-Fi, we're Eco-Friendly & have the Largest Menu in the Sierra"
'Click' Here to Visit Happy Burger Diner in Mariposa... "We have FREE Wi-Fi, we're Eco-Friendly & have the Largest Menu in the Sierra"
'Click' for More Info: Inter-County Title Company Located in Mariposa, California
'Click' for More Info: Inter-County Title Company Located in Mariposa, California

Tjoman Buditaslim, Travis Holasek, Jose Alfonso Tellez, and Jose De Jesus Martinez are Alleged to Have Prepared and Submitted Fraudulent Loan Applications Resulting in More than $55 Million in Residential Mortgages

November 13, 2023 - SAN FRANCISCO - A federal grand jury has indicted Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”), Travis Holasek, Jose Alfonso US DOJTellez, and Jose De Jesus Martinez, with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft in connection with a years-long mortgage fraud scheme, announced United States Attorney Ismael J. Ramsey and Special Agent in Charge Herminia Neblina of the Federal Housing Finance Agency – Office of Inspector General.

According to the indictment, filed November 7, 2023, and unsealed yesterday, between May 2019 and August 23, 2023, Buditaslim, 51; Holasek, 51; Tellez, 26; and Martinez, 58, obtained more than $55 million in residential mortgage loans for home buyers in northern California by creating fraudulent documents that they submitted to residential mortgage origination companies. The fraudulent documents were used to qualify buyers for residential mortgage loans in connection with the fraud scheme. The defendants profited from the alleged mortgage fraud scheme by taking loan origination commissions, real estate broker commission payments from escrow, and direct payments from potential buyers who wrote checks directly to the defendants for submitting loan applications to mortgage origination companies on their behalf.

The indictment describes numerous details of the alleged scheme. For example, the indictment alleges that the defendants carried out their mortgage fraud scheme by assisting potential buyers with locating residential properties to purchase, creating false divorce decree documents and child support checks purportedly payable to the potential buyer from an individual the buyer had never been married to or even met, creating false and fabricated bank statements showing falsely inflated bank account balances for potential buyers, submitting loan applications containing materially false information about buyers’ income to a mortgage origination company, and collecting proceeds of home sales by directing payments from escrow to defendants and their associates.

As alleged in the indictment, the defendants did not inform the potential buyers that the fraudulent documents—including divorce papers, child support checks, and bank statements— were being fabricated. The defendants knew that based on the buyers’ true income and bank statement balances, the potential buyers would not have qualified for the mortgages for which the defendants applied. The indictment also describes how defendants also allegedly prepared and assisted in preparing false Uniform Residential Loan Applications (URLAs) for potential buyers. The URLAs contained false information about the loan applicants’ income and assets. Further, the loan application packages the defendants submitted also allegedly contained false and fabricated supporting documentation, including altered bank statements, fabricated divorce documents, and fabricated child support checks.

As a result of the alleged fraud scheme, a mortgage origination company (identified in the indictment as Mortgage Origination Company 1) was required to repurchase loans originated as a result of fraud that had been sold to a federally-chartered home mortgage purchaser, causing losses to the company of approximately $8,162,515.82.

Buditaslim was arrested on August 23, 2023, in Daly City, California, pursuant to a criminal complaint. He made his initial appearance in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on August 24, 2023. Martinez was arrested on November 7, 2023, and made his initial appearance in federal court on November 8, 2023. Tellez made his initial appearance in federal court on November 8, 2023. An initial appearance in federal court in San Francisco has not yet been scheduled for Holasek.

In sum, the Indictment charges each defendant with the following offenses:

Count(s)DefendantsCharge
1 Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”)
Travis Holasek
Jose Alfonso Tellez
Jose De Jesus Martinez
18 U.S.C. § 1349 – Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
2-3 Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”)
Travis Holasek
Jose Alfonso Tellez
Jose De Jesus Martinez
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud
4-5 Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”)
Travis Holasek
Jose Alfonso Tellez
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud
6 Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”)
Jose Alfonso Tellez
Jose De Jesus Martinez
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud
7 Tjoman Buditaslim (a/k/a “Joe Lim”) 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) – Aggravated Identity Theft
8 Travis Holasek 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) – Aggravated Identity Theft
9 Jose De Jesus Martinez 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) – Aggravated Identity Theft

An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If convicted, the defendants face a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, and a fine of $250,000, plus restitution if appropriate, for each violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349, as well as a mandatory sentence of two years in prison for each violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. However, any sentence following conviction would be imposed by the court after consideration of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and the federal statute governing the imposition of a sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Christiaan Highsmith and Emily Dahlke with the assistance of Aarian Beiti. The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Housing Finance Agency – Office of Inspector General, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development – Office of Inspector General, and the California Department of Justice.
Source: DOJ Release