February 20, 2015 - In February 2009, in response to significant weakness in the economy, lawmakers enacted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The legislation’s numerous spending and revenue provisions can be grouped into several categories according to their focus:
- Providing funds to states and localities—for example, by raising federal matching rates under Medicaid, providing aid for education, and increasing financial support for some transportation projects;
- Supporting people in need—such as by extending and expanding unemployment benefits and increasing benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly the Food Stamp program);
- Purchasing goods and services—for instance, by funding construction and other investment activities that could take several years to complete; and
- Providing temporary tax relief for individuals and businesses—such as by raising exemption amounts for the alternative minimum tax, adding a new Making Work Pay tax credit, and creating enhanced deductions for depreciation of business equipment.
Various recipients of ARRA funds (most recipients of grants and loans, contractors, and subcontractors) were required to report the number of jobs funded through ARRA after the end of each calendar quarter through December 2013. The law also requires CBO to comment on those reported numbers.
During calendar year 2013 recipients reported that ARRA funded an average of about 76,000 full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs. Those reports, however, do not provide a comprehensive estimate of the law's impact on U.S. employment, which could have been higher or lower than the number of FTE jobs reported, for several reasons (in addition to any issues concerning the quality of the reports' data). First, some of the jobs included in the reports might have existed even without the stimulus package, with employees working on the same activities or other activities. Second, the reports covered employers that received ARRA funding directly and those employers' immediate subcontractors (the so-called primary and secondary recipients of ARRA funding) but not lower-level subcontractors. Third, the reports did not attempt to measure the number of jobs that were created or retained indirectly as a result of recipients' increased income, and the increased income of their employees, which could have boosted demand for other products and services as they spent their paychecks. Fourth, the recipients' reports covered only certain ARRA appropriations, which encompassed about one-fifth of the total either spent by the government or conveyed through tax reductions in ARRA; the reports did not measure the effects of other provisions of the stimulus package, such as tax cuts and transfer payments (including unemployment insurance payments) to individual people.
Estimating the law's overall effects on employment requires a more comprehensive analysis than can be achieved by using the recipients' reports. Therefore, looking at recorded spending to date along with estimates of the other effects of ARRA on spending and revenues, CBO has estimated the law's impact on employment and economic output using evidence about the effects of previous similar policies and drawing on various mathematical models that represent the workings of the economy. On that basis, CBO estimates that ARRA's policies had the following effects in calendar year 2014 compared with what would have occurred otherwise:
- They raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between a small fraction of a percent and 0.2 percent,
- They lowered the unemployment rate by an amount between a small fraction of a percentage point and 0.2 percentage points,
- They increased the number of people employed by between 0.1 million and 0.3 million, and
- They increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by between a slight amount and 0.2 million.
Although CBO has examined data on output and employment during the period since ARRA's enactment, those data are not as helpful in determining ARRA's economic effects as might be supposed because isolating the effects would require knowing what path the economy would have taken in the absence of the law. Because that path cannot be observed, the new data add only limited information about ARRA's impact.
Source: Congressional Budget Office
