The biggest difference between AB26/AB 34 and AB 266 is the dual licensing scheme – a conditional license would be issued by the State Department of Consumer Affairs, but the operating license issued by the locality in accordance with any adopted rules. RCRC is in the process of preparing suggested amendments to AB 266 as well.
While the above-mentioned measures are likely to receive significant attention, there could be a handful of other marijuana-related bills introduced before the February 27, 2015 bill introduction deadline.
In addition to legislation, the Governor’s proposed 2015-16 Budget allots $1.5 million from the General Fund to the State Water Board to create the Marijuana Cultivation Enforcement Team to regulate and enforce waste discharge requirements on marijuana cultivation activities. These funds could ultimately tie into implementing AB 243 should it become law.
The text of AB 266 can be accessed here.
The text of AB 26 can be accessed here.
The text of AB 34 can be accessed here.
The text of Ab 243 can be accessed here.
Source: Rural County Representatives of California