High-Country Health Food and Cafe in Mariposa California

haze npca mark rose d0b6d8c2 3a82 4ce6 8ebb 377460121688 banner
Haze shrouds Sequoia National Park
Credit: Mark Rose/NPCA

December 2, 2025 - On Monday, the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks released the following:

Comments Submitted via regulations.gov: 
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/EPA-HQ-OAR-2025-1477-0001

December 1, 2025

Paige Wantlin
Air Quality Policy Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Environmental Protection Agency
109 TW Alexander Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Wa***********@*pa.gov

Subject: Comments on EPA’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Visibility Protection: Regional Haze State Plan Requirements Rule Revision

Dear Ms. Wantlin:

We are writing on behalf of more than 4,600 members of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks (Coalition), who collectively represent more than 50,000 years of national park management and stewardship experience. The Coalition studies, educates, speaks, and acts for the preservation of America’s National Park System. Among our members are former National Park Service (NPS) directors, regional directors, superintendents, resource specialists, park rangers, maintenance and administrative staff, volunteers and other supporters. We strongly support efforts to ensure that clean air and clear views are protected in our national parks across the country.

The Clean Air Act requires states to improve visibility in protected areas visited by millions of people each year to enjoy spectacular scenery, vital natural habitats, and exceptional night skies. It also requires each state to identify and evaluate the effects of industrial emissions from sources such as motor vehicles, power plants, and oil and gas operations on Class I airsheds both within and beyond their borders. Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles from its original source to national parks and communities along the way.

Some of our most iconic national parks across the country are protected as Class I areas. From the desert landscapes of Arches and Zion to the thermal features in Yellowstone, to granite peaks in Yosemite to the expansive seascape at Acadia, these national parks are treasured by Americans and worldwide visitors alike. Many of our members have dedicated decades of service to protecting these special national park sites and public lands throughout the United States. It is critical that we work together to protect these irreplaceable resources for current visitors and future generations.

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on EPA’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Visibility Protection: Regional Haze State Plan Requirements Rule Revision.https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/10/02/2025-19280/visibility-protection-regional- haze-state-plan-requirements-rule-revision." role="button" aria-pressed="false" aria-describedby="mfn-content-00000000000008700000000000000000_48679-1" style="word-break: break-word; box-sizing: border-box; background-color: transparent; text-decoration: none; transition: 0.5s; color: blue;">1 Our comments are overarching and not specific to any of the three broad topic areas enumerated in the Notice. Overall, we urge EPA to ensure that any revisions or changes to the Regional Haze Rule safeguard: 1) the Rule’s primary goal to reduce visibility impairing pollution in Class I areas and 2) the requirement for states to make continued, reasonable progress toward natural visibility in Class I areas. We know that the Regional Haze Rule has worked to clear haze pollution from Class I areas – Great Smoky Mountains has increased visibility by nearly 40 miles over the last two decades. But there is still much work to do as no Class I areas has achieved the Clean Air Act goal of natural visibility and park visitors are still missing out on over 50 miles of scenic views.

We are concerned that EPA is suggesting numerous “alternative approaches” for implementing the Regional Haze Rule that run contrary to the text and purpose of the Clean Air Act. For instance, we’ve already seen EPA implement a “new policy” that reverses EPA’s longstanding position that the “uniform rate of progress” (URP) is not a safe harbor and states must make reasonable progress towards the goal of remedying visibility impairment.2 This “new policy” violates the Clean Air Act’s plain language and procedural requirements and is further suggested as an “alternative approach” to utilize in the future. Moreover, we’re concerned that many of the “alternative approaches” will allow states and industrial facilities to evade cleaning up controllable haze pollution and will eliminate requirements for states to develop regular regional haze plans.

We strongly urge EPA to safeguard the Regional Haze Rule for current and future planning periods to ensure our most treasured places are preserved and protected for current and future generations.

Thank you for considering our input on this important issue.

Sincerely,

Philip A. Francis Jr.
Chair
Washington, DC

Leon Folsom
Atlanta, GA

Julia Thomas McNamee
Shady Side, MD

Bob Krumenaker
New Mexico

Eric Burr
Mazama, WA

Robert Love
Tucson, AZ

David Donohue
Santa Fe, NM

Mike Wrigley
Colorado

Edward P. Walzer
Hesperia, MI

Jonathan Halpern
Tucson, AZ

Mary Riddle Cornell
Kalispell, MT

Edie Ramey
Lakewood, CO

Haydn J McLean
New Holland, PA

Valerie Naylor
Rapid City, SD

Cliff Kevill
Bryson City, NC

John Apel
Montrose, CO

Helen Scully
Pearl City, HI

Don Dollar
Morro Bay, CA

Melissa Axtman
Richmond, NH

Janis Kozlowski
Anchorage, AK

Dave Neumann
Ashland, OR

Charnetta Hensley
Logan, WV

Pete Nigh
Prescott, AZ

Tonnie Cummings
Vancouver, WA

Rebecca Mills
Berkeley, CA

Rebecca Jones
Northfield, OH

Rick Erisman
Pittsburgh, PA

John Reynolds
Crozet, VA

Anne Cully
Albuquerque, NM

Oron Bass
High Springs, FL

Stephen Gibbons
Mount Vernon, WA

Paul Kennard
Seattle, WA

Jerry Case
Lovell, WY

Sarah Hubbell
Sudbury, MA

Carl Stapler
Evanston, WY

William Hall
Washington, DC

Ries Collier
Bedford, VA

Pamela Fanoele
Galena, KS

Cynthia Sequanna
Bisbee, AZ

Randi Smith
Spearfish, SD

Nike Stevens
Bozeman, MT

Kenneth Apschnikat
Bowling Green, KY


The Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks represents over 3,400 current, former, and retired employees and volunteers of the National Park Service, with over 50,000 collective years of stewardship of America’s most precious natural and cultural resources. Recognized as the Voices of Experience, the Coalition educates, speaks, and acts for the preservation and protection of the National Park System, and mission-related programs of the National Park Service. More information can be found at https://protectnps.org

Source: Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks
Happy Burger 300 lg